Blog••Sales Skills

MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC: Which One Your Team Needs

Sarah Johnson

Sarah Johnson

Writes about field sales, meeting notes and voice-first workflows at ParrotNotes. Every article is reviewed by the ParrotNotes product team before it goes live.

MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC: Which One Your Team Needs

Luis had the verbal yes on September 3. The plant VP at a regional bottler shook his hand after the compressor trial and said, "Send the paperwork, we're doing this." His MEDDIC scorecard was green on all six letters. Metrics, economic buyer, criteria, process, pain, champion: every box had a name and a date beside it.

The order arrived in late November. Supplier onboarding wanted an insurance certificate in a format his company didn't have. Legal sent back the liability clause twice. The deal slipped a quarter, and his forecast went with it. (Luis is a composite, built from situations field reps describe, not a real person.)

Nothing in his MEDDIC notes was wrong. It just stopped at "we've decided." That gap is the heart of the MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC question. This guide shows exactly what the two extra letters add, why you'll also see MEDDICC and MEDDPIC, and a 10-deal audit that tells you whether your team needs the longer version.

MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC: the short answer

MEDDPICC is MEDDIC plus two letters: P for Paper process and a second C for Competition. MEDDIC tracks how the customer decides. MEDDPICC also tracks what happens between the decision and a signed order, and what else the customer could do instead of buying from you.

If your deals slip after the customer says yes, or you lose to rivals and "do nothing" more than you'd like, add the letters. If one person signs and pays, plain MEDDIC is enough.

The letters only work if the answers get written down. Try ParrotNotes free: talk through your notes in the car after a meeting and get a transcript, a summary and your action items back.

MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC at a glance

MEDDICMEDDPICC
Letters6: Metrics, Economic buyer, Decision criteria, Decision process, Identify pain, Champion8: the same six plus Paper process and Competition
OriginCreated at PTC in 1996Grew out of MEDDIC later, as teams added letters
Ends atThe customer's decisionA signed order
Extra questionsNone"What happens after the yes?" and "What else could you do instead?"
Fits bestMid-size B2B deals, few approvers, light procurementLarge deals with procurement, legal, supplier setup and several rival options

What actually changes between MEDDIC and MEDDPICC

P: Paper process gets its own letter

In MEDDIC, the paperwork hides inside Decision process. Force Management, a sales training firm, says so directly in its MEDDIC vs MEDDPIC explainer: "In many MEDDIC frameworks used by B2B companies, the paper process is implied within the D for decision process."

Implied is the problem. A rep asks "how will you decide?" and hears about the trial, the committee and the VP. Nobody mentions supplier onboarding, legal redlines or the three-quote rule, because the person answering isn't the one who handles them.

MEDDPICC splits it out. The training company MEDDICC defines Paper process on its methodology page as "the series of steps that follow the Decision Process in how you will go from Decision to signature." Force Management adds that teams make the split when they sell into industries with complex procurement or legal workflows, government agencies among them.

If procurement is where your deals stall, our guide to selling to procurement covers that conversation in depth.

C: Competition becomes something you track

MEDDIC has no letter for rivals, so competition tends to live in reps' heads instead of the deal record.

The second C makes you write it down: other vendors, a fix the customer builds in-house, a different project winning the budget, and doing nothing at all. "Do nothing" is the rival most reps forget, and it wins a lot of deals.

I: Identify pain or Implicate the pain

This one trips people up when they compare sources. The original MEDDIC letter is Identify pain, and most guides keep that name in MEDDPICC too, including MEDDIC Academy.

MEDDICC, the training company, writes Implicate the Pain in its MEDDPICC version. Its definition: "Implicating the Pain means you have both Identified, Indicated, and Implicated the Pain your solution solves with your customer." In plain words, it's not enough to find the problem. The customer has to agree what it costs them and connect it to your solution.

You don't need to pick a side. Treat "implicate" as the stricter test for the same letter: can you name who owns the pain and what leaving it alone costs?

MEDDIC, MEDDICC, MEDDPIC, MEDDPICC: the spellings explained

You'll meet four spellings, sometimes in the same company. Here's what each one means.

SpellingLetters added to MEDDICWho uses it
MEDDICNone. The original sixThe 1996 PTC version, per MEDDICC's history of who created MEDDIC
MEDDICCCompetitionMEDDICC lists it as the step between MEDDIC and MEDDPICC
MEDDPICPaper processForce Management describes it for teams with heavy paperwork
MEDDPICCPaper process and CompetitionThe full eight-letter version, and the one MEDDICC teaches

MEDDICC's version table calls MEDDPICC "the most complete version." Complete isn't the same as right for you: every letter is a field someone has to keep current.

Do you need the extra letters? Run the slipped-deal audit

Here's a test you can run in an afternoon with data you already have. It answers the MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC question for your team, not a typical enterprise.

  1. Pull your last 10 lost or slipped deals. Slipped means the close date moved by a month or more. Use your CRM's history or your win-loss analysis notes.
  2. For each deal, write the moment it went wrong. One sentence, in plain words. "Legal sat on the terms for six weeks" or "they decided to rebuild the old line."
  3. Sort each deal into one bucket:
    • After the yes: legal, procurement, supplier setup, budget re-approval, the PO. That's a Paper process problem.
    • Lost to an alternative: a rival vendor, an in-house fix, another project, or no decision. That's a Competition problem.
    • Inside MEDDIC: wrong economic buyer, weak champion, pain nobody owned, criteria you missed.
  4. Count the buckets. As a rule of thumb, if two or more deals out of 10 land in "after the yes," add P. If two or more land in "lost to an alternative," add the second C.

A worked example: one team's 10-deal log

This log belongs to a composite capital-equipment team: four reps selling packaging and compressed-air systems to food and beverage plants. The deals and details are illustrative.

DealWhat went wrongBucket
Bottler, compressor systemSupplier onboarding and two rounds of legal redlines after the verbal yesAfter the yes
Snack plant, case packerCapital committee met after the quarter endedAfter the yes
Dairy, palletizerCustomer refurbished its old palletizer insteadLost to an alternative
Brewery, filler upgradePlant manager wasn't the signer; CFO cut the budgetInside MEDDIC
Bakery, wrapperThree-quote rule surfaced at the PO stage; restarted the processAfter the yes
Juice co-packer, conveyorRival vendor offered a 10-week lead timeLost to an alternative
Frozen foods, case erectorChampion moved to another siteInside MEDDIC
Coffee roaster, baggerNo decision; project parked for a yearLost to an alternative
Pet food, robot cellProcurement required a new master agreementAfter the yes
Spice blender, labelerPain was a nice-to-have; nobody owned itInside MEDDIC

The count: four deals after the yes, three lost to an alternative, three inside MEDDIC. This team needs both letters. Four of its 10 losses happened after everyone in the room had agreed to buy, which is exactly the blind spot Paper process covers.

A team whose log showed nine deals "inside MEDDIC" would learn something different. Its problem isn't missing letters. It's how well the six existing letters get filled in, and our MEDDIC sales process guide is the better fix.

When plain MEDDIC is enough

Every extra letter is another question per meeting and another field per deal.

Take Marcus, a composite rep who sells shop equipment to independent auto repair owners. The owner is the economic buyer, the champion and the person who signs. There's no procurement team and no legal review. Paper process for Marcus is a credit application and a delivery date, and Decision process already covers it.

Plain MEDDIC fits teams like his:

  • One person approves and signs, inside their own spending limit
  • No supplier onboarding, legal review or formal tender
  • Rivals are few and known, and losses to them are rare in your audit

If your deals are smaller still, with a single buyer and a fast cycle, even MEDDIC may be more than you need. Our BANT vs MEDDIC comparison covers that choice.

Ready to see what your own notes say? Download ParrotNotes free, record your debrief after each visit this month, and run the audit on real detail instead of memory.

Switching from MEDDIC to MEDDPICC without a rollout headache

If the audit says add the letters, you don't need a new methodology launch. Keep everything your team does today and add two lines.

Add to every meeting note:

  • P, Paper process: What happens after the yes? Each step (supplier setup, legal, security or insurance review, budget sign-off, PO), who owns it, how long it took last time, and the date it must start
  • C, Competition: What else could they do? Each rival vendor, in-house option and "do nothing," and who inside favors it

Add to the weekly deal review:

  • "Who told you how the paperwork works, and when?"
  • "If they don't buy from us, what's the most likely thing they do instead?"

Ask the Paper process questions early, not at the proposal stage. Luis would have heard about the insurance certificate in September if he'd asked the plant's buyer, "The last time you added a new supplier, what did they have to send you?"

"Isn't this just a CRM exercise?"

That complaint is common on sales forums, and it's fair when reps fill in fields to please a manager. The fix is the evidence rule from our MEDDPICC guide: a letter only counts when you can say who told you and when. Fields filled from memory on Friday are a CRM exercise. A Paper process line that reads "Priya, procurement, October 15: legal takes two weeks" is a forecast you can defend.

Capturing Paper process and Competition after an in-person meeting

Paper process and Competition rarely come up in the formal meeting. You hear them in the corridor or from the buyer who walks you out, and by Friday the detail is gone.

Salesforce reports that sales reps spend 60% of their time on non-selling tasks. Rebuilding eight letters from memory is a poor use of that time.

A two-minute spoken debrief solves it. Add two lines to the end of whatever you already say after a meeting:

  1. "Paper process. After the yes, they need..."
  2. "Competition. Other options they mentioned..."

That's where ParrotNotes fits. Open the app as you get back to the car, hit record and talk. You get a transcript, an AI summary and your action items, plus a drafted follow-up email if you want one.

ParrotNotes includes sales frameworks: MEDDIC, SPIN and BANT. Apply MEDDIC to a recording and the insights are organized around its six letters. Say "paper process" and "competition" out loud as headings and both sit in the transcript and summary with the rest. Frameworks run on your AI-powered recordings: five a month on the free plan, unlimited on Pro.

Weeks later, when the deal reaches procurement, search your notes for "legal" or "onboarding" and the warning is there. Pro adds AI search across all your notes for $19.99 a month, or $14.99 a month billed annually, with 3,000 recording minutes a month.

If you record the meeting itself rather than your own debrief, ask everyone's permission first. Recording rules differ by state and country; our guide to one-party consent states explains the basics.

The bottom line on MEDDIC vs MEDDPICC

MEDDPICC isn't a different framework. It's MEDDIC with two blind spots closed. Here's the short version:

  • The P tracks the steps between "we've decided" and a signed order, which MEDDIC leaves inside Decision process
  • The second C puts rivals, in-house fixes and "do nothing" on the record
  • Identify vs Implicate is the same letter; "implicate" just sets a higher bar
  • Run the slipped-deal audit before you change anything: two or more of 10 deals in a bucket means add that letter

Luis's team now asks the onboarding question on the second visit. His next big order didn't wait on an insurance certificate.

Your next customer meeting is already on the calendar. Download ParrotNotes free, add the two new lines to your debrief, and start building the record your audit will need.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between MEDDIC and MEDDPICC?

MEDDPICC adds two letters to MEDDIC. P stands for Paper process, the legal, procurement and supplier steps between the customer's decision and a signed order. The second C stands for Competition, meaning rival vendors, in-house options and doing nothing. The other six letters are the same.

Is MEDDPICC better than MEDDIC?

It's more complete, not automatically better. MEDDPICC suits large deals with procurement, legal review and several alternatives. If one person approves and signs, the extra letters add work without adding much insight. Run the slipped-deal audit on your last 10 lost or slipped deals to decide.

What does the I stand for in MEDDPICC?

Most sources use Identify pain, the original MEDDIC letter. The training company MEDDICC uses Implicate the Pain in its MEDDPICC version, meaning the customer has agreed what the problem costs and linked it to your solution. Both refer to the same letter.

What is MEDDICC?

MEDDICC is MEDDIC with Competition added as a second C, without Paper process. MEDDICC, the training company, presents it as the step between MEDDIC and MEDDPICC. MEDDPIC is the opposite: Paper process added, without Competition.

Can I switch from MEDDIC to MEDDPICC mid-quarter?

Yes. You don't need to requalify every deal. Add Paper process and Competition lines to your meeting notes and deal review, then fill them in at the next visit for each open opportunity, starting with deals expected to close soonest.